Government announces the establishment of an independent statutory Tribunal to deal with claims arising from CervicalCheck
From Department of Health
Published on
Last updated on
From Department of Health
Published on
Last updated on
Minister for Health, Simon Harris TD, today (Wednesday) announced the government has agreed to establish an independent statutory tribunal to deal with claims arising from CervicalCheck.
The Minister secured Government approval to prepare legislative proposals as a matter of priority, but the government acknowledged this will take time to establish.
The Cabinet approved the appointment of Ms Justice Mary Irvine as Chair of the Tribunal. Ms Justice Irvine will begin preparatory work as soon as possible ahead of the establishment of the tribunal later in 2019.
The Minister also confirmed he is to examine the early establishment of a non-statutory scheme to provide ex-gratia payments for the women affected by the non-disclosure of the audit.
The Tribunal will be established based on the recommendations set out by Mr Justice Charles Meenan in his recent report on an alternative system for dealing with cases arising from CervicalCheck.
Hearings will be held in private and will be less adversarial than the current court process due to the adoption of pre-hearing protocols and case management procedures.
Once established, cases will be dealt with in a timely manner. The Tribunal will differ from the current court process in that it will be voluntary for all parties.
Minister Harris emphasised that establishing a Tribunal does not, in any way, restrict the right of women or their families to give evidence in public in the High Court, if that is their wish.
Minister Harris said:
“The Tribunal will allow women to progress their cases in a timely and sensitive, less adversarial manner, while equally respecting the constitutional entitlement of all parties to a fair hearing."
“I want to thank Ms Justice Irvine for taking on this role. I look forward to engaging with her in the new year and progressing with this work as soon as possible."
“This will take time to establish but all arms of Government are working to progress as a matter of urgency. I will also consider the establishment of an ex-gratia compensatory scheme to deal with any accepted non-disclosure to the 221 women and their families and I hope to progress this in the new year.”
ENDS
Judge Meenan proposed that claims arising out of CervicalCheck could be resolved outside the court process and that a Tribunal be established under statute for the purpose of hearing and determining these claims. Judge Meenan set out a summary of what would be required in legislation in Appendix 1 of his report.
Judge Meenan concluded that no matter what alternative system is proposed legislation is going to be required.
The issue of liability in CervicalCheck cases is not straightforward. It relates to:
Smear tests are a screening not a diagnostic process. There are serious issues on liability on the reading of the smears. A significant number of smears will be reported as showing no abnormalities despite there being possible abnormalities present. Judge Meenan notes that this does not, of itself, amount to negligence on the part of the person(s) reading the smear.
The Judge has advised that, given the issues on liability, a redress scheme based on “no fault” liability is not appropriate. The proposed Tribunal must take into account the respective liability in each case, each person’s constitutional right of access to the courts and the constitutional right of the parties involved to fair procedures.
The Hon. Ms. Justice Mary Irvine